Compare Launch app →
Cursor vs Qwen
Compare Cursor vs Qwen: pricing, context window, benchmarks (coding, math, reasoning), capabilities. Updated April 2026.
Open in compare tool — pick different models →Cursor
cursor.com ↗ Qwen
chat.qwen.ai ↗ Pricing
Free tier
Limited completions, GPT-4o-mini default
Generous free tier in consumer app
Standard plan
Pro — $20/mo
Plus — API only
Top plan
Business — $40/mo
API only — API only
API input / 1M tokens
—
$0.40 Best
API output / 1M tokens
—
$1.20 Best
Capability
Context window
200K
256K Best
Max output tokens
8K
8K Best
Knowledge cutoff
Live (web)
2026-01
Benchmarks
Coding (LiveCodeBench)
—
72% Best
Math (AIME 2025)
—
85% Best
Reasoning (GPQA Diamond)
—
74% Best
Human pref. (LMArena Elo)
—
1370 Best
Features
Image input
Partial
✓
Voice mode
—
✓
Web search
✓
✓
File upload
✓
✓
Image generation
—
✓
Code execution
✓
✓
Agent / tool use
✓
✓
Persistent memory
✓
✓
Cursor
IDE-integrated coding tool, not a chat AI. Routes to Claude, GPT, Gemini under the hood. Best autocomplete + agent mode in the IDE-tools class.
Qwen
Frontier-tier benchmarks at the lowest API cost in the high-quality tier. Open weights for Qwen 3-235B (Apache 2.0). Chinese hosting raises data-residency considerations.
Or skip the choice
Get all 2 of them — plus 30+ more — for $14.99/month.
Perspective AI bundles ChatGPT-class, Claude, Gemini, and Grok in one app. Switch mid-conversation. No per-vendor logins, no separate bills.