Compare Launch app →
Claude Opus vs Qwen
Compare Claude Opus vs Qwen: pricing, context window, benchmarks (coding, math, reasoning), capabilities. Updated April 2026.
Open in compare tool — pick different models →Claude Opus
claude.ai ↗ Qwen
chat.qwen.ai ↗ Pricing
Free tier
Not available on free tier
Generous free tier in consumer app
Standard plan
Max 5× — $100/mo
Plus — API only
Top plan
Max 20× — $200/mo
API only — API only
API input / 1M tokens
$15.00
$0.40 Best
API output / 1M tokens
$75.00
$1.20 Best
Capability
Context window
1M Best
256K
Max output tokens
64K Best
8K
Knowledge cutoff
2026-03
2026-01
Benchmarks
Coding (LiveCodeBench)
82% Best
72%
Math (AIME 2025)
81%
85% Best
Reasoning (GPQA Diamond)
88% Best
74%
Human pref. (LMArena Elo)
1428 Best
1370
Features
Image input
✓
✓
Voice mode
Partial
✓
Web search
✓
✓
File upload
✓
✓
Image generation
—
✓
Code execution
✓
✓
Agent / tool use
✓
✓
Persistent memory
✓
✓
Claude Opus
Frontier reasoning model. 5× the cost of Sonnet for ~5pt benchmark lift.
Qwen
Frontier-tier benchmarks at the lowest API cost in the high-quality tier. Open weights for Qwen 3-235B (Apache 2.0). Chinese hosting raises data-residency considerations.
Or skip the choice
Get all 2 of them — plus 30+ more — for $14.99/month.
Perspective AI bundles ChatGPT-class, Claude, Gemini, and Grok in one app. Switch mid-conversation. No per-vendor logins, no separate bills.